The Pity Of War pdf 夸克云 tct umd 下载 2025 azw3 kindle

A landmark work of history that challenges our most basic assumpti*** about the causes and c***equences of the First World War In The Pity of War, Niall Ferguson makes a *** and provocative argument: that the human atrocity known as the Great Wa***as entirely England's fault. Britain, according to Ferguson, entered into war based on nave assumpti*** of German aims-and England's entry into the war transformed a Continental conflict into a world war, which they then badly mishandled, necessitating American involvement. The wa***as not inevitable, Ferguson argues, but rather the result of the mistaken decisi*** of individuals who would later claim to have been in the grip of huge impersonal forces. That the wa***as wicked, horrific, inhuman, is memorialized in part by the poetry of men like Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon, but also by cold statistics. More British soldiers were killed in the first day of the Battle of the Somme than Americans in the Vietnam War; indeed, the total British fatalities in that single battle-some 420,000-exceeds the entire American fatalities for both World Wars. And yet, as Ferguson writes, while the war itself was a disastrous folly, the great majority of men who fought it did so with enthusiasm. Ferguson vividly brings back to life this terrifying period, not through dry citation of chronological chapter and verse but through a series of brilliant chapters focusing on key ways in which we now view the First World War. For anyone wanting to understand why wars are fought, why men are willing to fight them, and why the world is as it is today, there is no sharper nor more stimulating guide than Niall Ferguson's The Pity of War.

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：The Pity Of War在线阅读

在线听书地址：The Pity Of War在线收听

在线购买地址：The Pity Of War在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

A landmark work of history that challenges our most basic assumpti*** about the causes and c***equences of the First World War In The Pity of War, Niall Ferguson makes a *** and provocative argument: that the human atrocity known as the Great Wa***as entirely England's fault. Britain, according to Ferguson, entered into war based on nave assumpti*** of German aims-and England's entry into the war transformed a Continental conflict into a world war, which they then badly mishandled, necessitating American involvement. The wa***as not inevitable, Ferguson argues, but rather the result of the mistaken decisi*** of individuals who would later claim to have been in the grip of huge impersonal forces. That the wa***as wicked, horrific, inhuman, is memorialized in part by the poetry of men like Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon, but also by cold statistics. More British soldiers were killed in the first day of the Battle of the Somme than Americans in the Vietnam War; indeed, the total British fatalities in that single battle-some 420,000-exceeds the entire American fatalities for both World Wars. And yet, as Ferguson writes, while the war itself was a disastrous folly, the great majority of men who fought it did so with enthusiasm. Ferguson vividly brings back to life this terrifying period, not through dry citation of chronological chapter and verse but through a series of brilliant chapters focusing on key ways in which we now view the First World War. For anyone wanting to understand why wars are fought, why men are willing to fight them, and why the world is as it is today, there is no sharper nor more stimulating guide than Niall Ferguson's The Pity of War.